"Marina Warner begins with the gospels, noting the slight allusions to Mary, and the curious confusions between the two women of that name. She points out the falsities, fables and manifest fabrications that have shaped mariolatry. This intriguing and intelligent book is an attempt to explain the origins, growth, appeal and persistence of the Virgin's cult. The narrative is a rich, allusive tapestry set in a framework of theological commentary." -New Society
Marina Warner's work has often been described as something of a paradox - whilst she is rooted in the traditional forms of myth a fairy tale, she maintains a wholly contemporary view in her thinking. This book analyses her work from many different critical angles.
Hearings Before the Special Subcommittee on Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-first Congress, Second Session, on Section 805 of H.R. 16098 ....
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Special Subcommittee on Education
A Critique of Nawal El-Saadawi with a Reply by Nawal El-Saadawi
Author: Georges Tarabishi
Publisher: Al Saqi
ISBN:
Category: Social Science
Page: 232
View: 854
This is a provocative critique of the work of the Egyptian feminist Nawal el-Saadawi. Tarabishi argues that the heroines of her novels, far from being shining examples obliterated womanhood, have unconsciously absorbed a male ideology that actually works against the interests of women. Their revolt is not, he claims, the result of their oppression by men, but of their connivance with their oppressor and their acceptance of his view of the world. Saadawi's heroines are accused of elitism. These doctors, lawyers and medical students, shunning the world of ordinary women, show a distinct lack of solidarity with their sex. They are not, as they claim, fighting a society which oppresses them, but, in reacting against the very fact of being women, are struggling against nature. Tarabishi proclaims that he is defending feminism against its false friends. In a spirited reply, Saadawi counters that his critique is based on a rigid and outmoded Freudian analysis.